
10-19-2024, 04:22 PM
|
 |
Chase
Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 1,743
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth
I just quoted from the indictment, which IS the charge. We went through this at length before. I suggest that before you continue down the same wrong road, you reread the prior thread where virtually everything you thought was shown to be objectively wrong by reference to the case documents. He did not bring it up, the government did. And he responded. Now technically he was not charged with the actual trimming of the card, which of course is not a crime, he was charged with not disclosing the trimming in marketing materials where he touted Mastronet's prior sales of the Wagner. In other words, fraud. Again, it was not the focus of the case, shill bidding was. And I would presume shill bidding is what the judge was focused on in sentencing Mastro, although there was some discussion of the Wagner charge in the relevant sentencing documents, also referenced in the other thread.
https://www.net54baseball.com/showth...ght=memorandum
Dayenu.
|
LOLOLOL. So are you suggesting that this was not a good double down bet by Snowman?
__________________
( h @ $ e A n + l e y
|