Quote:
Originally Posted by G1911
The transcript shows you started the fight because you misread the post. I like the graph though, would work for a lot of other threads.
|
Good one. Nice narrative.
My post:
Quote:
Originally Posted by JollyElm
Look, I have no horse in this race (riot), and have no interest in getting wrath for speaking up, but when someone refers to a beanie, the immediate thought has always been using it to compare (read: insult) someone to a little, clueless kid wearing a propeller on his hat... a genericized beanie.
I checked Wikipedia for the hell of it and the listing is Beanie (seamed cap). Can't find anything about Judaism there.
Color me confused about the anger flying here.
Attachment 636944 |
Clearly in the very first sentence,
I state that I have no horse in this race, which I don't. Can't recall ever interacting with the member taking all of the scorn. Maybe a contrarian will dig up posts that show me conversing with him, but it would be a surprise to me. And that's followed by me saying that I have no interest in getting wrath for bringing it up.
Literally, nothing there to argue about. I stated that I was confused about the anger and basically asked,
"What's the problem with mentioning a beanie here?"
See, any rational person
(which would exclude you), might say,
"JollyElm, much like Steven Tyler with his scarves, it is well-know that a yarmulke is sort of Probstein's trademark, and that's why there's blowback."
I would've said,
"Okay, thanks for the info."
But you??? Of course not, it has to be an argument.
You quoted me, typed your bullshit implying that I'm some sort of apologist,
and now want to pretend I started it????????????? HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You very well could be the funniest person alive.
Now you can stop and just move on and I'll do the same. Ball's in your court.