Read a few of the raiderguy10 submission threads over the past 10 years. That's a good way to get approximations, and ground truth from the people that submitted.
Speaking of the card side, I just reported about 20 of the 100 1954 Topps "Gray" Backs in their APR based on them not being gray backs based on photographic imagery (~15) and another 5 just because they sold so low at auction they had to be white backs. But you're right, incompetence on their card side does trickle over to my feelings on the auto side.
And no question that a counterfeit signature with the PSA/DNA stamp of approval is worth more than a real sig. That doesn't mean we should let them off the hook for getting it wrong.
__________________
--
PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head
PSA: Regularly Get Cheated
BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern
SGC: Closed auto authentication business
JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC
Oh, what a difference a year makes.
|