View Single Post
  #4  
Old 08-15-2024, 11:57 AM
jchcollins's Avatar
jchcollins jchcollins is offline
John Collins
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: NC
Posts: 3,593
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zach Wheat View Post
Interesting thread. I always used to prefer sharp corners over centering until I ran into this set. No matter how centered the card is, they always look off center T to B because of the way they were printed. I prefer strong centering L to R, with a wide enough space above the name

Yeah, it’s a nightmare set for centering purists. I’m not in my normal card collecting life, but have discovered over the years that if the centering affects how design elements (like name, secondary image on ‘54 Topps) are positioned in relation to the edge of the card, I quickly become a centering freak. Another example of this for me is the team lettering on 1963 Topps. With the colored full-bleed bottom border, ‘63s can sometimes be o/c and not really look it - but I absolutely hate it when the team name shows little or no color beneath it and looks like it was almost cut off at the bottom of the card. I recently got rid of an otherwise very clean ‘63 Mantle due to this problem.

I digress. ‘54 especially after you see uncut sheets is really just odd. The names for a lot are pushed to the top by virtue of the design and there is just not much room for error when it’s also badly OC. Same with the black and white action player image, many of which on the cards were designed to encroach into the border as almost a little gimmick. I’m a Cubs fan and the Banks RC was a must for me and my team set endeavors, but I am NOT a fan in general of the 1954 Topps layout.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets.
Reply With Quote