I don’t even know how to respond to this but I guess I’ll try. I literally copy/pasted what I thought should be done and you either mixed my comments up with someone else’s or are just glossing over them because you don’t agree.
-Increased visible security (said this twice in one post and that it should be the top priority)
-Increased cameras that are visible (think TV monitor showing your face when you walk in like retailers do)
And then the kicker…INCREASED personal responsibility for those set up..but then again, it really shouldn’t be an increase because it should be a top priority already.
In regards to it being not labor intensive…maybe. If you’re legitimately just looking at ID’s then you are right. But that would really serve little to no purpose in deterring theft, as I stated earlier in this thread. If you’re collecting, verifying, maintaining & storing ID information, that would be VERY labor intensive and likely cost prohibitive…especially at a larger venue.
Also, pretty weird you’re talking about “safe spaces” and “delicate sensibilities” when you’re the one who is obviously getting hot and bothered that others don’t agree fully support your single idea.
Yeah…you’re mixing up comments.
