View Single Post
  #10  
Old 07-17-2024, 10:47 PM
bullgill bullgill is offline
member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 78
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Topnotchsy View Post
If you have gotten some great deals there, then it definitely makes sense to take a flier like this. Hopefully the next round is better.
They are supposed to be getting allot more in, and I will be there
There were tons of cards but nothing pre 1978 and I just can't wrap my head around that much junk and pick out the goods. I looked for jersy cards and stuff but found none, there were some slabbed ones that used to be expensive in the 90's. Personally I think the photo is probably too good to be true but there are some out there that passed psa authentication and sold for around $500. I think the ball is legit though. It is a sloppy auto but my gut tells me it is legit for that reason and it has age to it (exactly like I like my balls) lol. I'm not the type of person to try to dupe people but I'm pretty sure I can get at least $100 off the photo and somebody can take a chance. I see plenty of the same photo selling that even to my untrained eyes are forgeries, considering I can find at least 10 examples of each auto that are identical.

The main reason why I don't like the photo is the fact that the sigs do not look felt tipped, they are too solid also the same photo seems to have many fakes floating around. I am kind of wondering though, how old this "fake" is, from the looks of the photo it looks original when it was printed in 1986, looks to have some age to it. The obvious fakes to even my eyes are not on photo paper and even lack the copyright, the ones that generally sell for between $30-$125. Apparently these "photos" came in three sizes, 28x22 & 10x8 & 11x13. I would be interested in knowing why the others think it is no good as well other than the fact it was had for $5.

Here is one that passed inspection, purportedly and sold for $600.

https://showpiecessports.com/collect...o-with-jsa-coa

Last edited by bullgill; 07-17-2024 at 11:01 PM.
Reply With Quote