Quote:
Originally Posted by Snowman
The reason you get criticized for posting comparisons of cards using drastically different scanner settings and pretend like those images are reflective of some sort of imaginary "work" that was done to the cards is because you literally do exactly that. Graders notes aren't going to help you.
Serious question for you though... Do you even own a single vintage card?
|
It would be interesting to be able to see the grader notes on this card. The images clearly show a stain on the top right in the before and there does not appear to be a stain on the after photo. Please note that the after photo was adjust by you to match the settings of the before and posted in a previous thread. Where did the stain go?? Either the stain never existed or it magically disappeared. If we had the graders notes, then we would have written evidence to support the visual evidence.
I’m surprised that PSA and others will use photo matching to authenticate items since, as you claim, photo matching is “reflective of some sort of imaginary work.” I’m also curious as to why PSA would develop photo matching technology, like Genamint, to help track and detect altered cards. It was also interesting that PSA deactivated Kurt’s Card Care submission after being presented with before and after photos.
It seems evident to me that using before and after images is a valid and reliable way to detect and determine if an alteration has been made on a card.
Yes, I own vintage cards.
I’m not here to argue or upset you. Therefore, this will be my only response to you on this thread. Take care.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk