Quote:
Originally Posted by Leon
+1 This AI technology might help with that a lot. I like the Notes...we'll see how it goes.
|
1a) 100%. I am surprised that PSA's tech company purchase from a few year's back isn't being used.
1b) When I say, it isn't being used, it's an educated guess based on some recent PSA grading results (inconsistency). would love to see the internal grader notes if the 2 examples below
example 1 = a popular 60s topps card went from an undergraded "5" to "min size note met" to "6". all psa. another popular mid-60s card went from an undergraded "psa 6" to "psa 8" jeez. come on. these 2 cards were all recent subs also.
1c) i also think this tech can help us w/ trimmed cards in holders of all decades. so many high profile people in the hobby like to post higher grade vintage pc cards from their collection and honestly (in MY OPINION), a good 50% of them appear trimmed. it's a total joke. images can be digitally measured. side note: 90% of these cards i'm typing about are in older PSA cert slabs.
2. getting back to scanned images. we need some sort of standard. i bought a 33 goudey gehrig this yr. the auction house's scanned image and PSA differ greatly. when i saw both sets of pics initially, i thought it had paper loss in 2-3 areas. turns out, has none.