Quote:
Originally Posted by jayshum
Probably some of both, but considering he put up numbers that were far better than most pitchers in the league, it would seem like he figured it out should get more of the credit.
|
Considering he led in ERA+ just twice* in those five years, perhaps the gap over the rest of pitchers isn't quite as large as perceived.
* - yes, leading twice is really, really good. Let's be real clear on that.