Quote:
Originally Posted by CobbSpikedMe
Ok, I looked at some basic stats and here are the results of Judge's adjusted stats based on at bats to Pujols career stats.
What does this tell us? This is where Judge is headed if he has the same at bats that Pujols has. Pujols only wins in the hits, but Judge still has 3,000+ hits at this pace.
There are a couple of stats/facts for you.
.
|
Obviously I think Pujols is better, but I'm not even arguing the stats. I'm arguing that an opinion that openly states it is not being fact-based, about an issue for which we can easily pull thousands of facts, is completely illogical and silly.
Why would you hold an opinion that is not fact based, when you could instead let facts shape opinion, and use reason?