Quote:
Originally Posted by JustinD
I know I am likely in the minority here, but I agree with PSAs position on this one.
There is no mention of Ruth anywhere, and though I am not denying it is a generic usage of a Ruth photo in the basis for the artwork, it seemed silly to label it as a Babe Ruth card, Adding “Babe Ruth shown” in parentheses may have worked but the labeling as was seemed suspect.
|
Is the 1929 Shonen Ruth image also suspect in your opinion?