Quote:
Originally Posted by Casey2296
I'm not sure I understand the ethical argument here, technically yes, talking to any other person about a listing would be considered collusion.
In reality, it happens more like this.
"Hey, did you see that E-card in XYZ auction?"
"I did, are you interested in it? I know we both collect cards like that."
"Yes, I'd probably be at 2K on it, I have my eye on that T-card in the same auction so that would be my priority".
"I'd probably go 2.5K since I need it for my collection."
"Okay, good luck, I hope you get it."
And the results are usually my buddy overpaying for the E-card and me overpaying for the T-card since there are always other bidders involved, and more often than not neither one of us wins.
Now I could see if all of the potential bidders got together and chose one guy to win like Scott's example link, that would definitely qualify has collusion.
|
Exactly my point, acting like 2 buddies deciding to prioritize which item they are going for the hardest has ANY material change on the auction final price is funny, as if there aren't 20 others bidding on most desirable items.