Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth
I don't want any result here. I am simply stating my opinion, which happens to be informed by decades of experience which I am sure you will disregard as some sort of "appeal to authority" which it is not.
|
I am using the dictionary definition of words. You are using your experience to define what a word means instead, rejecting dictionaries. Yes, I am sure it is my route that is fallacious
If the defense of Memory Lane relies on
1) Rejecting the dictionary
or
2) Following Republican Clown's religious values and/or having a flex off with him over who has more money
or
3) an unseen insurance policy/choice/decision with no precedent in all of human history and that is obviously fiction
One might start to conclude that the difficulty in finding a reasonable argument is an indicator that something doesn't make sense here.
Can anyone put forth an argument for Memory Lane that, while it will surely differ with other posters over the values placed on honesty, disclosure and forthrightness in that the argument will have to reject them implicitly, is at least a serious argument that does not rely on absurdities that absolutely nobody here would accept if it didn't benefit what they want to benefit? None of the defenses would be accepted if it was me doing the fake auction and I made them, and we surely all know that on some level. Surely a better case can be made.