Quote:
Originally Posted by butchie_t
It is a bit puzzling to me that the card went through all the hoops initially and got the initial grades. Then they are notified of some malfeasance and they do a mulligan and find the alterations. If it was obvious the second review, why was it not just as obvious during the first evaluation?
How come that did not get caught in the first place?
Asking for a friend.
Butch Turner....
|
I think they were presented with photographic evidence that this exact card had a different patch previously. So wasn’t that they reinspected it and found shenanigans. I don’t know how people are swapping patches without leaving damage or evidence, but apparently it is incredibly common.
__________________
.
||
||
\/
If you want a deal, you might not get a card. If you want a card, you might not get a deal.
|