Quote:
Originally Posted by G1911
When did I argue that card values are not set by actual sales? What?
Again, for those who cannot even follow a three to four sentence argument, I have written the premises and conclusion several times. The raw example is to set that it is material; as when honestly presented the trimmed copy is worth less. There’s a reason I win the trimmed sharp looking card and not the one that’s not altered. There’s a reason the fraudsters don’t sell it as trimmed. If it had the same value, why lie? It establishes materiality.
|
What's material for raw does not translate any more to slabbed. This is not hard to understand. It is not a valid proof, it is proof of a different proposition.