Quote:
Originally Posted by G1911
I'm slow and dumb, but I still don't understand how something is cheating if the action committed was not against the rules at the time the action was done.
It's not cheating to throw a spitball in 1905. It is cheating to throw it in 1995, because the rules changed. Being in violation of the rules seems to be a prerequisite to cheating.
What am I missing here?
|
Point taken. I should used the phrase "trying to gain a competitive advantage through PEDs that were later deemed illegal" instead of outright cheating.