[Brian Van Horn]

Originally Posted by gunboat82

your overall point stands, but i have a minor quibble. The issue is not the "brian's account is flawed in some unknowable way." the issue is that, even accepting everything he claims as 100% true, his conclusion that the cards are fake is built on several logical fallacies.

Even if everyone could agree that nothing is truly certain, the anecdotal evidence that these are fake is laughably weak. It reminded me of thanksgiving this year, when my dad quoted the my pillow guy as gospel and assured me that all the evidence i needed was that the my pillow guy knows his stuff.

lol!