View Single Post
  #8  
Old 11-12-2023, 08:39 PM
bcbgcbrcb bcbgcbrcb is offline
Phil Garry
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 7,066
Default

Anyone know when SGC started slabbing these as 1918-20? Everyone always used 1916-20 and it was well documented that 1916 wasn’t possible based on the players in the set but as far as I know, 1917 is a possibility, albeit not nearly as likely as 1918-20 but not sure what gave SGC the impetus to remove it altogether? The dating is especially crucial as it pertains to Rogers Hornsby and Sam Rice as this set is a potential rookie card candidate for both.

Last edited by bcbgcbrcb; 11-12-2023 at 08:42 PM.
Reply With Quote