View Single Post
  #121  
Old 10-30-2023, 11:08 AM
steve B steve B is online now
Steve Birmingham
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: eastern Mass.
Posts: 8,391
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by todeen View Post
That's interesting. But I wonder if the carbon dating was messed up by collecting dust from other sources due to being displayed etc. Plus, doesn't carbon dating an item give you a range of dates +/- fifty years. You would think for an item this "young" that carbon dating would not be helpful and could be called into question.
I think the mask was old enough, but I'm not sure. The technology has changed for the better apparently.

I just learned of a different way of describing dates. BP, which is "before present" referring to dates before January 1, 1950. Somewhat randomly chosen, but tied to both the beginning of carbon dating, and the proliferation of nuclear testing which altered the radioactive carbon available enough that it has to be accounted for.
Reply With Quote