View Single Post
  #5  
Old 10-13-2023, 09:16 AM
Shankweather's Avatar
Shankweather Shankweather is offline
Stephen Benzel
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 214
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by molenick View Post
I think the consensus is that W600s, T3s, N173s, T5s, and similar issues are baseball cards and can be considered rookie cards. Their method of distribution or size was not something I thought excluded them from being baseball cards.
Close to a consensus on this thread for sure, but I've seen it debated elsewhere. And random distribution is definitely a must for post-war rookie card eligibility. (Topps Now doesn't count as a "true" RC, for example.) I probably try to unify things across eras too much, but to me randomness feels essential to what the spirit of a baseball card is. But feelings can be wrong.

Quote:
Originally Posted by molenick View Post
Technically, T cards were not directly available to many people (children) because they could not buy tobacco products. It's not a perfect analogy, but as you said in post 75, "the point isn't really if Midwest kids in the 30s could find one, it's can we find one?".
But we literally can't find one. Total pop (PSA+SGC) for W600 is 448 and there are 465 players in the set. Less than one card per player. I know there are lots of ungraded examples out there, but the graded population is at least a way to compare one set to another. Old Judge isn't exactly plentiful, but that average pop/player is 35.
__________________
https://allthecubs.com/collection
Looking for:
1903 E107 Frank Chance
Reply With Quote