View Single Post
  #8  
Old 10-11-2023, 11:41 AM
Shankweather's Avatar
Shankweather Shankweather is offline
Stephen Benzel
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 214
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhotchkiss View Post
Just because you can’t realistically obtain the card does not disqualify it from being a rookie card.

To me, there is no rational justification for excluding e107 - it’s clearly a card and it comes from a set. I believe W600s are also cards, meaning Wagner, Matty, Chance and others with Type 1 examples have their rookies in the W600 sets. I will go a step further- although I recognize that it’s a bit more controversial, I think the M101-1s should be considered rookies
We exclude cards from RC eligibility for lots of reasons. Regional team issues like Kahn's, and team photo packs, and minor league cards. And weird 1-of-1 sets like 1904 Allegheny. There are lots of first cards that aren't rookie cards. We may disagree about one or all of those things, but they're fairly common reasons. Not many argue for 1980 TCMA or 1982 Red Lobster to be Ryne Sandberg's RC instead of 1983 Donruss/Fleer/Topps. If we're willing to exclude 1-of-1 Allegheny, excluding 1-of-2 Breisch-Williams isn't that big of a leap.
__________________
https://allthecubs.com/collection
Looking for:
1903 E107 Frank Chance
Reply With Quote