Quote:
Originally Posted by molenick
While I agree that a redo would be fair, I don't see how this can happen.
Not everyone who won a lot is on Net54. As far as they are concerned, they got an invoice and paid for their card, and expect to get that card. They may have no idea about the controversy and don't care that the process was unfair to one of the bidders.
Heritage can withhold the cards but I have no idea what that would mean legally. If Powell believes he has a legal claim to the set because at one point he was told he won on the screen (which later said he lost), the other bidders have a stronger claim because not only were they told they won, it never switched to telling them they lost, and they were invoiced when the auction ended.
And, no, I did not win any of the lots.
Also, I think it is a little unfair to make Aaron feel bad because he won a lot in an auction.
|
From a legal standpoint, until someone actually takes possession of the cards, it would be difficult for any bidder to prove actual damages (beyond wasting their time). Paying an invoice -- whether it's the individual bidders or the complete set bidder -- changes little in this regard, because Heritage could simply refund the money and mitigate the damages.
Getting a court to order specific performance as an equitable remedy (requiring Heritage to accept payment and turn over the cards) is very difficult, even when the dispute is over something as unique as this set.