I think I can see how it works.
I was thinking probably too narrow, identifying that two pictured objects are in fact the same object, and that it got smaller between two different dates.
But it would have to include info about how the edge quality changed, and other things. And since they're all related as "proof" if one was disallowed, the rest are far less useful. Like if you can show the edge quality doesn't match original examples, but can't show that the card got smaller between dates, the edge info won't matter. Or the other way around.
So you'd probably need multiple experts? In my limited experience, people have a hard time grasping someone being a generalist, however knowledgeable.
It seems odd to me that if someone like PSA used a flawed method of determining trimming, then that becomes the standard method.... I guess one of those "things get strange sometimes" things.
|