Quote:
Originally Posted by raulus
HA.
No disrespect to this august body, but I'm not convinced they will be effectively swayed by my participation in this forum.
I haven't really considered how I'm going to approach it once they get back to me. If they are dismissive, then I'll probably have to find ways to push a little harder. And I suppose a little online pressure can sometimes be used to help a company do the right thing.
But we'll see how it goes, and I'll be happy to share the outcome when it unfolds.
My guess is they'll look at the data, suggest that they are two different cards, and thank me for my time. Or some variation on that theme.
|
They're not going to care about a before scan of the card in question. All they can do, and I would argue all that they should be expected to do, is evaluate the card itself again, in hand. You can point them to the alteration, but if it is not detectable in hand, under a loupe, then it's not detectable. This is why so many trimmed cards get the thumbs up from them after being sent in for review. If it measures correctly and the edges look right, there's really nothing they can do. However, in this case, it should be detectable.