I am aware of the Tinker and have read about it in the past, but I have never seen one. I would agree that it’s more of a variation than a printing error or anomaly, which would make it more like Doyle/Magie than Nodress, etc. But until/unless a huge swell of support develops and is supported by TPGs and auction houses, which I doubt will happen, the Tinker variation will not be considered #525.
The Schulte Proof/variation is awesome!
Here is the Mathewson proof listed above; it certainly has increased in value!
Last edited by Rhotchkiss; 07-19-2023 at 06:21 PM.
|