T206
Hi- welcome to net54! Your post will invite many differing opinions. Here is
my 2 cents' worth:
1) If you want all of your cards to be graded by PSA, you seem destined to
fulfill your own prophecy.
2) Specifically with regard to disparities in T206 grading between PSA and
SGC, I lack the faith some have in PSA to grade properly. Again, for those
who can't wait to unleash, I am referring ONLY to T206 grading. PSA is
far too "qualifier happy", a perfect example of which is their "MC" qualifier
when a player name is missing 1/16 of an inch on the bottom portion.
3) If you think the specific card in question has been graded properly, I
would definitely not crack and resubmit with the expectation that PSA will
somehow do it "better", meaning in your case give a higher grade. If
anything, they are more likely to disappoint you- again, with specific
regard to T206. It's a crapshoot you have to pay for and flatly hope
they will accommodate you so, if SGC grade is proper, it would be prudent
to stay put since it's slabbed already and correct.
4) Depending on the card, which of course we don't know, perhaps you could
find a member with the equivalent PSA version and seek a trade??
Trent King
|