
03-20-2023, 09:55 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 319
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobC
Hey Mile,
I'm guessing that SGC may be cracking down in their grading of these somehow if they only gave you an "A" on that blue ink, ad-backed Chase silk. In looking at it I can't see any reason it shouldn't at least deserve a 1, or even a slightly higher grade. At least they do still grade them. PSA has never graded them, and SGC basically had them all to themselves. Beckett did grade them, not sure they still do, but only seen a very few S74 silks in their holders. CSG now does grade the silks as well, but their pop reports show only a very small few, less than 10, have been graded in total. Honestly don't believe there is much of an interest in people sending in S74 silks to grade anymore, other than a few rare occasions like yours, where you do so more for the consistency in your collection than anything else. Just wish they could decide and settle on one uniform, consistent standard in grading them then, and maybe quit treating them the same as actual cards in terms of grading. They are a satin material and not actual cards, even with the paper backing on some. LOL
Sorry about my erroneous info regarding the number of possible Helmar backed cards out there. When I mentioned three being known I was basing that off a Heritage auction description I had seen, and forgot about some additional Helmar silks being found by other since then. Check the auction lot description in the link below. Regardless, they are still so rare, your chances of finding a Chase version are still close to nil.
https://sports.ha.com/itm/baseball/e...umbnail-071515
Haven't had a chance to see what Chase silks I may have extras of. Will see if I can be of any help in your chase for Chase. LOL
|
Thanks, I appreciate that Bob!
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
|