Quote:
Originally Posted by Lorewalker
I think after reading some of the threads on the other forum about Will Jaimet, the comparison to Greg Morris and this 47 Spahn is highly invalid but I do get the point Greg was trying to make.
|
The proposed idea, that there is nothing a seller should do beyond refunding a buyer if they catch the alteration and complain while very specifically rejecting the notion the seller should disclose the alteration in the listing, is 100% the same as Jaimet's claimed policy that was resoundingly mocked.
Obviously other aspects of the cases are completely different and have never been claimed to be the same (GM lists altered cards without disclosure but there is no reason to think they alter them themselves or anything), but this proposed policy to defend Morris declining to ID altered cards after being informed is exactly the same, as claimed.