Quote:
Originally Posted by G1911
So your objection is to political narratives, and nothing actually in the law at all?
That was my original point. It’s rage bait for both sides, the actual law is pretty hard to object too because you have to endorse teaching open racism to do so.
Governors lie. The media lies. Go to the source and don’t play the rage bait game. Somebody saying something doesn’t make it true.
|
We should both read the opinion and amicus briefs to understand better the specific objections to the language. I do think parts of it are vague and arguably could be construed to support certain actions, but at the same time I agree with you that there isn't anything blatant on its face, at least as I read it.