Quote:
Originally Posted by insidethewrapper
Can't believe these guys didn't know about how 1950's cards look ! Graded down because of the border cuts. That's the way they were cut back then. They know the shiny ones.
|
Just curious, when we look back at cards from different eras, we see some idiosyncrasies with different aspects of the production process (for example, rough cuts and size variation). Should there be a ding in the grade if a new and shiny card had a rough cut? If so, shouldn't the grading criteria for one era be assigned to all eras? I would think for consistency sake that all cards be graded according to the same criteria.
A lot of us have seen cards from the 50s that are truly NrMt in look/appeal but have a rough cut to them. In the end, if the TPG cuts the card a little "slack" because of the rough cut, then the ultimate judge will be the price people are willing to pay for the card. However that becomes a little skewed because not all people buy the card, they buy the number on the flip.
Ramble, ramble, ramble...
