View Single Post
  #8  
Old 01-09-2023, 05:02 AM
bgar3 bgar3 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: new jersey
Posts: 1,126
Default

No for me also. The photographer was born in 1854 so the early date of 1868 is highly unlikely, more likely 1875-85. Nice early image.
Reply With Quote