View Single Post
  #5  
Old 01-07-2023, 09:45 AM
puckpaul puckpaul is offline
P.aul Orl,in
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 752
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snapolit1 View Post
Of course there were guys in amazing shape. But a great many of them weren't amazing athletes at all.
Wow, that is just not true. You can be in great shape and not an amazing athlete and vice versa. Ruth was overweight or fat most of his career.

In hockey, there were only 6 teams and maybe 20 spots, so you are talking about competing against the 120 best players vs today the top 700 players. Yes, more diverse pool, but the best of these guys were great athletes.

Nutrition and size has changed a lot though, and many early ballplayers in all of these sports were 5’6” and 150 lbs.
Reply With Quote