Quote:
Originally Posted by G1911
Before they got the scam holder, as I recall it, they had a paper expert look at it and 'test' the card, determining it was from before 1921 and the lithography was consistent with 1910 printing. Even though the front, at least, appears to be from one of the 1985 Hygrade reprints. What I am getting at is that 'forensic testing' does not really even have much of a track record of good use in card land, and is a vague term here that doesn't even mean much.
|
I like my forensic testing when it comes to investigating crimes, not baseball cards. I would guess if there were to be forensic testing done, the best way to do that would be to test another Wagner along with it. As you have suggested, sports cards have little to no track record of forensic testing of paper or ink.