Technically, I think it is okay to mention a modern player, because the direct query in the OP is about Feller's rating, and thus necessitates the invocation of other names in order to establish Feller's empirical rank, as long as that rank aligns with his exact opinion, otherwise we will be called mentally disabled again. As long as the central question is Feller's rank and the modern player is used to justify a correct position on that issue, it should be within the tight constraints of not having that terrible foible of human conversation, of evolving.
Anyways here's a Feller I got for $5 a few years ago. It's one of the super prints in this issue but a great pose and career contemporary card for dirt cheap. This and the 1956 Topps are his best 'bang for the buck' cards in my eyes.
Disclosure: I have no clue what my blood pressure is today.
|