Quote:
Originally Posted by BobC
LOL
That's okay, I'll be happy with the '54 and '62 Mays cards I already have.
And sounds like you're agreeing with me, it is not the pop reports causing what seems to be a bit of a pricing anomaly for these two cards. We'll probably never know what could have caused such a big price differential between those two PSA 9 Mays cards in that last REA auction then?
|
Obviously the bidders are responsible for the price differential. But beyond that, digging into why these two cards have the relative values that they have in relation to one another is likely to remain a bit of an enigma.
But the 1962T selling for 25% more than the 1954T seems to follow the historical relationship between these two cards pretty closely. Whether the bidders had that in mind in the heat of the action is unlikely. But that’s definitely where the chips fell in the end. The invisible hand at work!