Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth
Man you are being smug today. You also said the feds would not take the time and effort, suggesting to me you were not aware they are in fact devoting a substantial time and effort.
PS, he would not be charged with altering cards, it would be with mail and wire fraud for selling without disclosure.
|
I copied your exact condescending phrasing, that you chose to use first. Smugness breeds smugness.
I am, again, aware, which is why I said exactly what I said. “Charged for fraud”. “Fraud for altering cards” is, very obviously, not the literal name of the crime but a descriptor of what has happened, on which we seem to agree. We are, of course, all intimately aware that Brent did not alter cards to silently keep in his personal collection.