Quote:
Originally Posted by Lorewalker
You should listen again. I would link it if I recalled which interview I was thinking of but it was pretty soon after the acquisition of Genamint. Nat made it very clear that he wanted to maintain grade integrity. He may have even called it grade integrity. He then went on to explain that if we break out a card and resubmit it the software is designed to identify the prior submission history and the card is going right back into the same holder.
Anyway, your earlier discussion on explaining AI limitations in grading were fascinating and very informative. I appreciated the time you took to explain it to us all.
As far as their use of Genamint, it has been mentioned to me that they are not even using the technology but not sure how the person who told me would have any knowledge of that but I know we all know someone who knows someone.
|
Ya, I recall him saying that as well, but I also seem to recall him saying something along the lines of that just being his personal preference but that for reasons outside of his control, it can't really be that way. And that others he respected felt differently.
Also, this simply wouldn't even be possible with ultra-modern cards unless they were serial numbered or had an auto on them.