Quote:
Originally Posted by cgjackson222
That's interesting that their Genamint "AI" doesn't seem to work at detecting if a card has been previously graded. I thought that Kevin Lenane, PSA's current President founded/developed Genamint, and its "success" was one reason why he was elevated to President. Perhaps Genamint is being used in other ways besides determining if cards had been graded previously?
There was so much buzz around AI being used for grading for a while. And now again with the Brian Lee/ Derek Jeter sports card grading venture that is supposed to utilize blockchain/AI it is back in the news.
Has any company actually successfully utilized AI for grading yet?
I personally would not have a big problem with it if it could lead to more consistent grading.
|
I'm a data scientist and I write very similar AI code for work, although my work was more geared toward detecting anomalies in images due to things like cancer or genetic abnormalities in imaging scans. However, at the core, it's a very similar problem to detecting flaws in card scans. Somewhere around here, I made a (very lengthy) post or three about the challenges that any TPG would face when trying to use"AI" to grade cards. Cliff notes are that while I believe some tasks can be automated, ultimately I believe it is a fool's errand to attempt to truly automate grading through AI.
...found it. Here's a link to the first of 3 posts where I explain some of the intricacies of AI/machine learning and how those can present challenges for grading cards:
https://net54baseball.com/showpost.p...5&postcount=17