View Single Post
  #7  
Old 09-06-2022, 04:34 AM
lukewarm_pizza lukewarm_pizza is offline
Elliot
member
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: Michigan
Posts: 67
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by frankhardy View Post
I voted. It's hard to separate value and mass production from the actual design. I tried to do that. For instance, I gave 1958 a score of 6, but I gave 1987 a score of 9.

10s for me include 1975, 1983, 2000, 2001, 2002, and 2003.
I feel the same way. I definitely had some intrinsic bias toward the older designs simply because they carry more value and were less produced. It was hard to judge solely on design.
Reply With Quote