I have a question which I am asking respectfully in regard to the original post (not trying to be a wise-ass).
Does something qualifying as "a photo used for a card" have to maintain the exact pose on the card as on the photo or does it just have to be close enough to assume that it was the photo used. Is there a difference between "a photo used for a card" and "a photo that was the basis for a card".
The photo and the card have a clear resemblance but there are some key differences (such as how far back his head is tilted and the angle the mask is being held at).
[Edited to add: I wrote this and posted it before seeing Brian's comments.]
__________________
My avatar is a drawing of a 1958 Topps Hank Aaron by my daughter. If you are interested in one in a similar style based on the card of your choice, details can be found by searching threads with the title phrase Custom Baseball Card Artwork or by PMing me.
Last edited by molenick; 06-24-2022 at 11:56 AM.
|