View Single Post
  #148  
Old 06-19-2022, 11:32 AM
Fuddjcal Fuddjcal is offline
Chuck Tapia
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,199
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jingram058 View Post
I can't believe intelligent, well-heeled people would fork over colossal sums of money for either the 1952 or 1953 Topps Mantle cards. They look like something out of a comic book. No envy or jealousy. I find them both absolutely stupid looking. Laughably so. If you gave me the money I would buy something else. And then there's a Roy Campanella Bowman card that's even worse, a weird looking tiny hat on his otherwise big head that is just out and out ridiculous looking.
And that's why 1952 Topps is king and 54 Bowman is garbage
As time goes by, I love the 52 and 53 topps Mantle cards. They have 1 name. They don't need 6 names and be a 1 of 1 PSA 10 either.

The more I see of the Mantle 53 pig nose pose, the more I like it and the artwork.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1952 Topps Roy Campanella A.jpg (202.6 KB, 286 views)
File Type: jpg 1954 Bowman Roy Campanella A.jpg (223.2 KB, 287 views)
File Type: jpg 1952 Topps Mickey Mantle A.jpg (208.4 KB, 288 views)
File Type: jpg 1953 Topps Mickey Mantle A.jpg (205.2 KB, 287 views)

Last edited by Fuddjcal; 06-19-2022 at 11:33 AM.
Reply With Quote