| 
			
			 
			
				05-24-2022, 08:16 PM
			
			
			
		 | 
	| 
		
			|  | M@RK ST€!NBERG 
				Member
 |  | 
					Join Date: Apr 2009 
						Posts: 8,393
					      |  | 
	
	| 
				  
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by G1911  This is the boat I am in.  Is it realistic to expect me to have kept documentation of what I paid for a card 18 years ago at a show when I was 13?  Was it $100, or $125?  Maybe it was $200.  I don't know, and if I do know (I can't recall what I had for breakfast last Monday but I do recall what a lot of my cards cost exactly for some reason), I sure as hell can't provide any evidence.  The burden of proof has largely shifted with this change.  
 If I can't recall what I paid or can't document it at all, I can risk the IRS coming after me or just pay full income taxes for what the 1099 states even though my cost surely wasn't $0.  Which for me is almost 50% (9.3-10.3% state + 35% federal= 44.3-45.3% total) income tax (plus 10% sales tax on whatever I paid originally) on the full sale price if I don't know the exact figure I paid for it.
 
 Even the most honest tax-payer realistically has to make guesstimates sometimes.  I highly doubt anyone here has gotten receipts for every single item they've ever purchased.  It's simply not practical, or realistic.  Try asking a dealer at your local show for an itemized receipt of all 100 cards you just bought from him for your tax records if you sell a dupe in 20 years, and let us know what they say.
 
 I don't think one has to be a scofflaw to question or not enjoy this shifting of the burden of proof and not being a fan of half their money going to the state every year as income tax, sales tax, property tax, and a dozen more.
 |  Excellent “real world” perspective.  I would bet most collectors are in the same exact boat!
		 
			
			
			
			
				  |