Quote:
Originally Posted by Lorewalker
The 79 is a nice card but at the risk of upsetting you, I think it is graded accurately. Lower right is showing quite a bit of paper loss for even a NM. I would agree it has better than EXMT eye appeal, overall, but all 4 corners have wear.
Just curious if that was a card you submitted to PSA, if you care to answer.
|
I've been waiting for this since the first (new) post showing the Gretzky card. IMO this is the elephant in the room that nobody is talking about.
Border chipping, weak BR corner, and the Oil Drop is somewhat askew. It's a 6 in many people's views.
Not the first (or last) time the submitter believes the card is undergraded. Nice eye appeal, but technically accurate.