Quote:
Originally Posted by BobC
I hate to tell you this, but you're wrong. As of this moment, that is the last football Brady has thrown for a TD in his career. And there is no guarantee he won't turn around and re-retire next week, or come back and get injured on the first offensive play of the first game back and never be able to play again, or get hit by the proverbial pie truck and be killed on his way to the stadium. That may be your view, but the courts cannot decide things based on contingencies like this.
So what happens if they go to court and the auction winner prevails and gets out of paying for the football, and then the very next day Brady re-retires, and this time it is permanent. Are you suggesting the seller can now countersue and force the auction winner to buy the football for their winning auction bid after all? Do you see the problem with your logic here?
|
Buyer can refuse to pay and by the time it reaches the courts it will no longer be Brady’s last TD ball as was promised. If you think he’s not going to throw another TD, you’re probably wrong. As a Bills fan I can assure you the man can throw TDs.
Also, relax on the you’re wrong proclamations. As a head banging attorney I can tell you that’s there really good arguments on both sides here. It’s about choosing which one you think is right and making the best argument you can for it. The outcome here is far from certain despite your thinking it is.