I think the early slabs that had no brand attribution were counted twice.
Total Change
261.0k – 220.8k = 40.2k
Total with Brand Info at Minimum
180.0k
Total without Any Brand Info
220.8k – 180.0k = 40.8k
That means over the past couple weeks that ~600 cards were graded (and I can literally account for around 5% of them myself, not joking).
And if the dwellers of Olympus can be bothered to respond to anyone, I'm curious if this is what really happened. The numbers make sense.
Quote:
Originally Posted by swarmee
Another option then: maybe double-counting of some slabs due to the various flip label variations? Maybe the numbers were bloating over time and this was an adjustment to actuals once they detected the software summing error?
|