Quote:
Originally Posted by BobbyStrawberry
I totally agree. This gets to the heart of my original question in that it seems then that their decision not to do more expansion of capacity is, in a way, admitting a lack of belief in their own product/service.
Contrast this with the approach SGC has taken, which seems to be "send us all your cards, we want more!"
|
SGC seems to have solved the backlog issue by using the primary economic principle from Econ 101: Backlog gets a little heavy, raise prices a bit, temporarily. Backlog gets down to normal levels, lower prices a bit to ensure steady flow of new submissions.
Result is, SGC can maintain service with reasonable timeframes for their customers, as well as some stability for their own business situation, with the managed submission rate.
Now they just need to establish a registry, preferably a non TPG specific one, to put themselves on even footing with PSA, among the registry crowd.