View Single Post
  #4  
Old 01-04-2022, 09:15 AM
Belfast1933's Avatar
Belfast1933 Belfast1933 is offline
Jeff
Je.ff Gro.ss
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Newburyport MA
Posts: 1,703
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hcv123 View Post
1) On a good day the grading companies are inconsistent and on a bad day bordering on incompetent. I can't tell you how many stories I've heard of people cracking and resubmitting - getting the same card back within a 3 grade range!! If you are REALLY good I would say you should be able to consistently land within a 1 grade deviation. Depending what you collect, that could represent some significant price differences, I just don't think it is realistic to get any better than that.

2) Have seemingly changed their standards over the years. Today's "7" looks very different from a 7 graded 15 years ago (with plenty of exceptions)

Tools - DEFINITELY a 10x lighted loupe. A blacklight. sample cards from the years you are looking at to check for sizing.
Thanks Howard... yeah, I'd settle to be within 1 grade of actual/received. I'll admit that I have sent in some newer cards (80's rookies, Mattingly, Strawberry, Sandberg) pretty certain they were very high grades and they came back with a big miss (by me).

Total waste of $$.

I've gotten better but I'm not sure I'm a +/- 1 grade DIY expert yet - at least not reliably.

Is this something this forum has ever considered - would we ever "crowd source" grade estimates for each other to see if we can save each other the time/cost to submit? Could get unwieldy, I suppose.

It feels like there may be some way to community-pre-grade somehow.

I'll keep try to learn myself as well.

Thanks again -

Jeff
Reply With Quote