One of pharma's favorite spins is relative vs absolute risk reduction. If I told you I had a pill that could cut your risk of serious adverse event X by 50 percent, you might be like, wow that's impressive. If I told you it could cut your risk from .001 to .0005, you might be, well is it worth the risks and side effects? Same data, different look.
__________________
Four phrases I nave coined that sum up today's hobby:
No consequences.
Stuff trumps all.
The flip is the commoodity.
Animal Farm grading.
Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 11-20-2021 at 03:02 PM.
|