Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveS
So here's a question I have for everybody. If you paid $1.4 million for this photograph, would you want to then pay for an ink analysis to find out for sure whether the writing was done in 1911 and the signature and place/date are in the same ink? Or would you rather not do that, to avoid the chance of finding out that you just spent a lot of money on something written in 2011?
|
If it was non-destructive, then yes.
I'd also want written assurances that the AH would make good on the item if it failed. That sort of stuff is usually arranged ahead of time.