Quote:
Originally Posted by smokelessjoe
Good... This is very good. So you do see some similarity. Do you think there is a possibility that those two guys are related? How about the two guys below?
Do you see and similarity between these two guys?
|
I guess it's plausible that this could be some sort of family photo or a photo of various family members, but I don't really see much reason to assume that. I don't think there is enough similarity across the members of the group to warrant that being my primary hypothesis. Most of the people appear to be similar in age to me, with the exception of the guy in the middle of the front row. He looks older to me than the other subjects.
I think we have a photo of 6 people taken in the 1850s, several of whom bear a significant resemblance to some of the members of the Knickerbockers. However, I think the ages of the men in this photo do not line up well with their appearances in the 1862 photo. I do not believe that these can be the same people if this is how they looked in 1857 and then just 5 years later, they looked how they do in the infamous salt print. However, I don't know how ironclad those two dates are. Perhaps this photo was taken in 1856 and the salt print was closer to 1865? If that could be the case, then I don't think I would rule this out as a potential Knickerbockers photo. But not ruling it out and concluding that it most likely is a Knickerbockers photo are not the same thing.
Overall, I think this is a fascinating and fun conversation. I know I've learned a lot about 19th-century photography just from the small amount of research I've done after discovering this thread. I still know next to nothing in the grand scheme of things, but it's a very intriguing field of study.
I'd like to see and learn more about the connections and potential provenance of this photo and any potential ties to the Knickerbockers though before I was convinced that this is indeed a photo of them. I definitely see the similarities in several of the people in the photos, but I'd want to know more before saying it can no longer just be a coincidence.
However, with the George Wright photo, I am as convinced as I possibly could be without ironclad provenance (e.g., the photo coming from his great-grandson or the descendants of someone who worked for him or who worked for the Red Stockings, etc.) that it is in fact a photo of George Wright